From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762977AbXJZTCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:02:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760322AbXJZTCX (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:02:23 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:57695 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760102AbXJZTCW (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:02:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:02:16 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option Message-Id: <20071026120216.0411e7c0.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1193411888.5032.9.camel@localhost> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David wrote: > I personally prefer an approach where cpusets take the responsibility for > determining how policies change (they use set_mempolicy() anyway to effect > their mems boundaries) because it's cpusets that has changed the available > nodemask out from beneath the application. Agreed. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401