From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] scsi: fix a few misleading comments in scsi.c Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:37:22 -0600 Message-ID: <20071026143722.GS27248@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071026134217.GA16709@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58387 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751378AbXJZOhX (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:37:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071026134217.GA16709@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: scameron@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:42:17AM -0500, scameron@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net wrote: > - * needs to be release with scsi_host_put once you're done with it. > + * needs to be release with scsi_device_put once you're done with it. s/release/released/ as well? > - * needs to be release with scsi_host_put once you're done with it. > + * needs to be release with scsi_device_put once you're done with it. ditto -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."