From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>
To: casey@schaufler-ca.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:01:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071027090112.GA5460@Ahmed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4720118C.5020906@schaufler-ca.com>
> +/**
> + * smk_write_cipso - write() for /smack/cipso
> + * @filp: file pointer, not actually used
> + * @buf: where to get the data from
> + * @count: bytes sent
> + * @ppos: where to start
> + *
> + * Returns number of bytes written or error code, as appropriate
> + */
> +static ssize_t smk_write_cipso(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
[...]
> +
> + /*
> + * Only allow one writer at a time. Writes should be
> + * quite rare and small in any case.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&smack_cipso_lock);
> +
> + *(data + count) = '\0';
> +
> + for (eolp = strchr(data, '\n'), linep = data;
> + eolp != NULL && rc >= 0;
> + linep = eolp + 1, eolp = strchr(linep, '\n')) {
> +
The problem here (As discussed in private mails) is that the for loop
assumes that the beginning of given user-space buffer is the beginning
of a rule. This leads to situations where the rule becomes "ecret 20",
or "cret 20" instead of "Secret 20". Big input buffers/files leads
smack to recieve a rule like "Secret 20" in fragmented chunks like:
write("<lots of rules before ours>\nSec", ..)
write("r", 1, ..)
write("et 20\n<remaing rules after ours>", ..)
Parsing a rule in such tough conditions in _kernel space_ is very
hard. I began to feel that it will be much easier if we do the parsing
in a userspace utility and let smack accept only small buffers (80 char).
i.e. A user space utility that takes a big input file like
exit 10/3,7,4
exit 10/3,7,4
exit 10/3,7,4
<100 times>
And transform it to 100 small write() calls. By this way we can return
-EINVAL if write()'s count field > 80, or if input contains no \n or
more than one.
Any Ideas ?.
Casey, I can begin modifying cipso_write() and writing this small
user-space utility now if you agree on this.
Regards,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
HomePage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 3:46 [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Casey Schaufler
2007-10-25 15:07 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-10-25 18:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-26 20:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-10-27 3:00 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2007-10-27 19:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-27 9:01 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2007-10-27 23:47 ` Al Viro
2007-10-28 5:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-28 12:46 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071027090112.GA5460@Ahmed \
--to=darwish.07@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.