From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA: Fix broken device refcounting
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:49:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071027154947.6836a3d9@siona> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193416577.9353.5.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:36:17 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -221,7 +220,6 @@ void dma_chan_cleanup(struct kref *kref)
> {
> struct dma_chan *chan = container_of(kref, struct dma_chan, refcount);
> chan->device->device_free_chan_resources(chan);
> - kref_put(&chan->device->refcount, dma_async_device_cleanup);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_chan_cleanup);
While I can't see any problems with the rest of the patch, I think this
part is wrong for the same reasons removing the kref_put() from the
class device cleanup function is. I don't see any constraint that
guarantees that dma_chan_cleanup() will always be called before
dma_dev_release(), which means that "chan" may have been freed before
this function gets a chance to run. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Håvard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-26 16:12 [PATCH] DMA: Fix broken device refcounting Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-10-26 16:36 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-27 13:49 ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
2007-10-27 19:12 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-28 19:17 ` Shannon Nelson
2007-10-29 16:02 ` Nelson, Shannon
2007-10-29 16:11 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-10-26 16:59 ` Nelson, Shannon
2007-10-26 17:10 ` Nelson, Shannon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071027154947.6836a3d9@siona \
--to=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shannon.nelson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.