All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jejb@steeleye.com,
	kernel-discuss@handhelds.org
Subject: Re: DMA API Re: Remove dma_coherent_mem interface
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:07:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101100717.GA26906@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193910526.25899.278.camel@wirenth>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:48:46AM +0000, ian wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 15:34 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >   It may not be significant, so it would be an easy decision to keep
> >   the interface.  But if the decision is going to be to keep the
> >   interface despite the lack of users and no matter what the
> >   performance win, then I don't need to finish this work.
> 
> I dont mind what the interface is as long as we can support devices that
> can only DMA from their own local RAM as described above...
> 
Indeed. The SH case for OHCI on MFDs is the same. So that's at least 2
users.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31 21:03 DMA API Re: Remove dma_coherent_mem interface ian
2007-10-31 21:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-01  9:48   ` ian
2007-11-01 10:07     ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-11-01 15:33       ` ian
2007-11-01 15:52         ` Bernhard Walle
2008-02-20 17:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-20 17:49   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-20 18:43     ` ian
2008-02-20 19:10       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-20 21:26         ` ian
2008-02-20 22:55           ` Russell King
2008-02-20 23:05             ` James Bottomley
2008-02-21 16:32   ` Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071101100717.GA26906@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jejb@steeleye.com \
    --cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=spyro@f2s.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.