From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Anderson Subject: Re: NIC and HBA based multipathing Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:09:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20071101220940.GA13204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <342d47870710300956k3bde2d06j7a50acc6c8225fe5@mail.gmail.com> <5fb0f77b0710301040l4eeca0a7n2ccdc00b14285294@mail.gmail.com> <342d47870710301211y42200594u444b7af7ae870e7@mail.gmail.com> <472A2EA5.8050609@cs.wisc.edu> <342d47870711011321j1ff065c3jb54589988f3c499f@mail.gmail.com> <20071101215726.GB11002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071101215726.GB11002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids Mike Anderson wrote: > I believe this is incorrect and you should use something like: > Sorry replying to my own mail. I should have not used incorrect. Depending on the version of tools one runs the keyword devnode_blacklist can deprecated so one should try blacklist. -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com