From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Anderson Subject: Re: Does dm handle tape devices? Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:51:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20071102195126.GA3712@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids lemons_terry@emc.com wrote: > Hi > > I need to provide persistent binding / persistent device naming for tape devices in Linux environments. Does device mapper provide some facility for this, or is DM only for disk devices? > Device mapper is only for block devices. I saw your similar question on the udev list. Is there some reason that udev will not provide a id that you can use. If not you can alter the udev rules (or add your own) to provide a persistent id for your environment. -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com