All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Bo Brant?n <bosse@acc.umu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:26:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.64.0711031329490.397338@stalin.acc.umu.se>

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:31:49PM +0100, Bo Brant?n wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I tryed different linux distributions on a computer with an Intel Core 2 
> Quad and I noticed that the 64-bit versions was at least 10 times slower 
> than the 32-bit versions, to boot the system took over 20 minutes in 64-bit 
> mode and then even scrolling text at the command prompt felt slow, however 
> Vista 64 boots as fast as Vista 32 on the same computer. So I would like to 
> ask if this is a known problem or if there is some simple misstake I can 
> have done.
> 
> I used live cd's from gentoo and ubunto and at least ubuntu has a rather 
> new kernel, also dmesg doesn't show anything strange, for example is the 
> bogomips figure the same as when booting in 32-bit mode.

This is typically due to a problem with the setup of your MTRRs. Try
booting with mem=nnnM where nnn is some number smaller than your
actual amount of memory.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-03 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-03 12:31 x86_64 ten times slower than i386 Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 16:26 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-11-03 22:38   ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 22:54     ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-03 23:30     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05  8:06     ` Joseph Fannin
2007-11-05 10:15     ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 16:00       ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:23         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05 18:46           ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 19:11             ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]         ` <2c0942db0711050832t5207ea8bib1f75e59e071ade2@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-06  0:26           ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-06  1:19             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:40               ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-06 19:50                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:53                   ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-07 18:38             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-11-10 13:41         ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:22       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=bosse@acc.umu.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.