From: Alberto Gonzalez <info@gnebu.es>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Laptop's HDD
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 00:02:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711040002.25784.info@gnebu.es> (raw)
Hi,
Maybe some of you have been hearing lately about a problem with laptop's hard
disk drives being killed by *insert Linux distro here* [1]
The problem comes from a very high rate of load/unload cycles of the heads
that reaches the 300.000-600.000 limit in 2-3 years (with smartmontools it
can checked it with "smartctl -A /dev/sda") . There are reports of HDD dying
even earlier for this problem [2]
For what I've read, it's not that Linux is doing anything special to your hard
disk, it's the BIOS settings that take care of killing your disk sooner than
later. However, I'm asking on this list because the problem seems to have
started with kernel 2.6.10 [3].
Windows seems to override the BIOS settings, so hardware vendors have never
cared about this problem.
So my question is: Is this something the (Linux) kernel should care about or
should distributions care about it with userspace tools?
By the way, this settings seem to be there in order to save power. However,
loading/unloading the heads ~3 times per minute doesn't seem like a very good
powersaving policy. Couldn't this be one of the reasons why Linux is using
generally more power than Windows?
Regards,
Alberto.
[1] - http://beranger.org/index.php?page=diary&2007/10/24/18/07/21
- http://ubuntudemon.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/laptop-hardrive-killer-bug/
[2] -
http://ubuntudemon.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/laptop-hardrive-killer-bug-is-worse-than-i-thought/#comment-31490
http://paul.luon.net/journal/hacking/BrokenHDDs.html
[3] - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-March/msg00463.html
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 23:02 Alberto Gonzalez [this message]
2007-11-05 11:10 ` Laptop's HDD Pádraig Brady
2007-11-09 14:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-11-10 3:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-10 20:25 ` Stephen Clark
2007-11-12 17:09 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711040002.25784.info@gnebu.es \
--to=info@gnebu.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.