From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Kemp Subject: Re: questions about ballooning Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 15:36:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20071104153632.GA24369@steve.org.uk> References: <1194187887.15096.1.camel@thinkpad.localdomain> <20071104150432.GA20812@steve.org.uk> <1194190202.15096.16.camel@thinkpad.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1194190202.15096.16.camel@thinkpad.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xen Developers List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sun Nov 04, 2007 at 16:30:02 +0100, Daniel Stodden wrote: > a leak of that size would not go unnoticed :) > outline, but no warranties, as i didn't build it: Thanks, that seems to match what I'm seeing and is a good explaination. ObReference: I use Xen in two ways 1. Xen hosting, where each guest has a lot of memory and dom0 just has a tiny amount of memory, set via dom0_mem 2. My desktop machine which has 0-4 guests running at any given moment. For the desktop case it is really noticeable when dom0 hasn't had the memory returned to it; firefox gets sluggish and xine doesn't work so well... Steve --