All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Audit issue
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:28:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711081928.07954.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711080959.31328.sgrubb@redhat.com>

On Thursday 08 November 2007 09:59:30 Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 08 November 2007 09:56:51 Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Easy enough to test - boot with audit disabled, run benchmarks, enable
> > it, flush all caches (e.g. by memory pressure), rerun the benchmarks,
> > compare...  I don't think it will be serious problem, but if it will
> > we can always look for trickier solutions.
>
> OK. I'll try to build a kernel and check this out. Might have some results
> later.

OK, had a chance to do testing. First, the patch works. It solves the problem 
that was reported. Here's some performance numbers using the performance test 
I have at http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/lspp-perf.tar.gz

without patch boot with audit=0
audit disabled: 38.9
audit enabled:  42.3

without patch boot with audit=1
audit disabled: 41.4
audit enabled: 42.9

with patch boot with audit=0
audit disabled: 38.6
audit enabled: 43.8

with patch boot with audit=1
audit disabled: 44.2
audit enabled: 44.6


So, when audit is enabled at boot. There is virtually no performance 
difference between enabled and not. The old way, we had a 4% performance 
improvement when audit was disabled. Looking at the audit=0 case, there is 
about a 3.5% performance hit when audit is enabled with the new patch. The 
old way, audit disabled was always significantly faster ~ %4. With the patch 
its only about 1% faster.

-Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-09  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200710301248.24261.sgrubb@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <200710301907.29505.sgrubb@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20071030231525.GG12499@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <200710311740.19981.sgrubb@redhat.com>
2007-11-08 14:19       ` Audit issue Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:27         ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-08 14:32           ` Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:47             ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-08 14:56               ` Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:59                 ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-09  0:28                   ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2007-11-08 14:35           ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711081928.07954.sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.