From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758647AbXKLKwS (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757671AbXKLKwF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:52:05 -0500 Received: from mtagate7.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.156]:11744 "EHLO mtagate7.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757485AbXKLKwE (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:52:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:52:01 +0200 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda To: Amit Shah Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/8] KVM: PVDMA: Introduce is_pv_device() dma operation Message-ID: <20071112105201.GG3299@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> References: <218cf425feff1d4daf23d3f25df1eb224108a1a3.1194445109.git.amit.shah@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <218cf425feff1d4daf23d3f25df1eb224108a1a3.1194445109.git.amit.shah@qumranet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote: > A guest can call dma_ops->is_pv_device() to find out if a device is > a passthrough'ed device (device passed on to a guest by the > host). If this is true, a hypercall will be made to translate DMA > mapping operations. Doesn't really belong in the DMA mapping API. Instead what I think we should do is to cache this (per device) value in the pci_device struct (or device struct?) and in the dma-ops implementation inspect it to decide exactly how to do DMA mapping for this device. Cheers, Muli From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: PVDMA: Introduce is_pv_device() dma operation Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20071112105201.GG3299@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> References: <218cf425feff1d4daf23d3f25df1eb224108a1a3.1194445109.git.amit.shah@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Amit Shah Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <218cf425feff1d4daf23d3f25df1eb224108a1a3.1194445109.git.amit.shah-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote: > A guest can call dma_ops->is_pv_device() to find out if a device is > a passthrough'ed device (device passed on to a guest by the > host). If this is true, a hypercall will be made to translate DMA > mapping operations. Doesn't really belong in the DMA mapping API. Instead what I think we should do is to cache this (per device) value in the pci_device struct (or device struct?) and in the dma-ops implementation inspect it to decide exactly how to do DMA mapping for this device. Cheers, Muli ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/