All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@domain.hid>
To: rpm@xenomai.org
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org, xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai v2.4-rc6
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:21:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711141221.47396.lepalom@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473AC972.8070209@domain.hid>

A Dimecres 14 Novembre 2007, Philippe Gerum va escriure:
> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > A Dimarts 13 Novembre 2007, Philippe Gerum va escriure:
> >> Here is the sixth candidate release for the v2.4.x branch.
> >
> > [....]
> >
> >> 	[i386, x86_64 => x86]
> >>
> >> 	* Merge i386 and x86_64 arch-dep support as x86.
> >>  	* Update Adeos/i386 support for 2.6.20, 2.6.22 and 2.6.23.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > this has break the creation of the debian packages. I can understand that
> > conceptually they are the same arch (one with 32bits and another with 64
> > and more extensions) in general _all_ the distros treat them as two
> > different arch.
>
> How long do you think this is going to be that way, with 2.6.24 actually
> merging those supports at kernel level?
>
>  So this changes break things. I don't think that it's a good idea do it
>
> > in a release candidate, IMHO.
>
> We discussed this issue and the reason for doing this change asap in
> length on the mailing list two weeks ago or so. Please have a look at
> the archive for more. You will also find some significant patches
> already exploiting the new common tree in order to streamline the code,
> and ease maintenance on our side. Few resources, large work, we have to
> be efficient, and maintaining two closely related archs sharing bits in
> separate code bases is pointless, and a loss of time for the project.
>

Ok,

I'm not subscribing to xenomai-core, so I don't know if this have been 
discussed on the list.

Yes, I didn't have done a search on the web/list about if this have been 
discused, I just have pointed that you are working (with a few resources, 
etc) to release a new version rc-6 and have done a change that break 
our "lazy way" of install/ compile xenomai. I don't know if others things.

I'm sure that you have worked/thought that this is the best way to do the 
things. Now I have read the thread about it and well, it's just a normal 
discussions about to make a important change and the people comment. You as 
project leader have an idea that you think that it's good for the project, 
and you implement it. And other people saying, ok, if you want to do it, I 
will try to help...

I can understand that my post have ..... I don't know the verb in english, in 
catalan will be "tocar-te els collons" and in english something like "touch 
your balls". That's not my intention, really.

I also will try to help it and I will look the debian packages to solve 
this ... ;-) and probably I'm one this strange people that if I use a open 
source soft and I begin I use a release candidate to test it and try help. At 
least some kind of .. please could you run bla, or can you try bla ... but 
I'm not statistically important because I'm not showed at google ;-)

Leo

PS from some mail that I have read:
... sun is still shining, birds are still singing, hardware is not burning - 
yet. 









  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-13 17:35 [Xenomai-core] Xenomai v2.4-rc6 Philippe Gerum
2007-11-14  9:56 ` [Xenomai-help] " Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
2007-11-14 10:09   ` [Xenomai-core] " Philippe Gerum
2007-11-14 11:21     ` Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda [this message]
2007-11-14 19:14       ` Philippe Gerum
2007-11-14 10:33   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-11-14 16:37   ` Paul
2007-11-14 17:49     ` Philippe Gerum
2007-11-14 17:51     ` Philippe Gerum
2007-11-14 22:14     ` Paul
2007-11-14 23:13       ` [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai-core] " Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
2007-11-15 22:02         ` [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] " Paul
2007-11-19 12:32           ` Philippe Gerum
2007-11-19 13:37             ` [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai-core] " Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
2007-11-19 13:46               ` [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] " Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711141221.47396.lepalom@domain.hid \
    --to=lepalom@domain.hid \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.