From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:58:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114185444.GB14450@kroah.com>
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
> >
> > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
> > In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
> > from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
> > from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ???tlb_flush_mmu???:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:76: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???release_pages??? include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function
> > ???tlb_remove_page???:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:105: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???page_cache_release??? make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/smp.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2
> >
> > I've been doing the following to fix it. I know it's not the right fix,
> > (see the earlier thread about it at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/24/441 )
> > but could the one line fix go into the -stable queue 2.6.23 while a
> > proper fix goes into 2.6.24?
>
> I think the patches that I have just added to the stable queue for
> 2.6.23.2 will fix this. If not, please let me know after testing.
Where do I find these patches to test? I know where to find the stable
releases, but not the "stable queue".
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt just says there _is_ a stable queue, not
where to access it. Google's first hit for "linux stable queue" was
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/stable-queue.git;a=shortlog
which apparently stopped updating in march...
Happy to test the patch you mentioned, if I can figure out where to find it...
Thanks,
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-04 4:51 User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1 Rob Landley
2007-11-14 18:54 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 5:58 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2007-11-15 6:02 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 20:57 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-15 21:06 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 3:08 ` [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1) WANG Cong
2007-11-16 5:01 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 7:15 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 15:51 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 16:53 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 22:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-17 18:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-18 20:17 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-18 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-19 7:14 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 18:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 15:12 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 15:26 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.