From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:50:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116105056.GC5453@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195205942.3059.1.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > + prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > rep_nop();
> > + preempt_enable();
>
> Why not have the rep_nop() here between the enable, and disable ?
yes, indeed - fixed.
> > + /*
> > + * If we preempted we skip this small amount of time:
> ^ migrated, perhaps?
yeah, fixed.
updated patch below.
Ingo
---------------->
Subject: x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
make delay_tsc() preemptible again.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
@@ -38,17 +38,34 @@ static void delay_loop(unsigned long loo
:"0" (loops));
}
-/* TSC based delay: */
+/*
+ * TSC based delay:
+ *
+ * We are careful about preemption as TSC's are per-CPU.
+ */
static void delay_tsc(unsigned long loops)
{
- unsigned long bclock, now;
+ unsigned long prev, now;
+ long left = loops;
+ int prev_cpu, cpu;
- preempt_disable(); /* TSC's are per-cpu */
- rdtscl(bclock);
+ preempt_disable();
+ rdtscl(prev);
do {
+ prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ preempt_enable();
rep_nop();
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
rdtscl(now);
- } while ((now-bclock) < loops);
+ /*
+ * If we migrated we skip this small amount of time:
+ */
+ if (prev_cpu != cpu)
+ prev = now;
+ left -= now - prev;
+ prev = now;
+ } while (left > 0);
preempt_enable();
}
Index: linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
@@ -26,17 +26,34 @@ int read_current_timer(unsigned long *ti
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * TSC based delay:
+ *
+ * We are careful about preemption as TSC's are per-CPU.
+ */
void __delay(unsigned long loops)
{
- unsigned bclock, now;
+ unsigned long prev, now;
+ long left = loops;
+ int prev_cpu, cpu;
- preempt_disable(); /* TSC's are pre-cpu */
- rdtscl(bclock);
+ preempt_disable();
+ rdtscl(prev);
do {
- rep_nop();
+ prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ preempt_enable();
+ rep_nop();
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
rdtscl(now);
- }
- while ((now-bclock) < loops);
+ /*
+ * If we migrated we skip this small amount of time:
+ */
+ if (prev_cpu != cpu)
+ prev = now;
+ left -= now - prev;
+ prev = now;
+ } while (left > 0);
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200711150400.lAF40lIr020160@hera.kernel.org>
2007-11-16 3:41 ` x86: disable preemption in delay_tsc() Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-16 3:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-16 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 8:47 ` [patch] x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-16 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071116105056.GC5453@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.