From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ItkEj-0001Zk-Eg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:30:57 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ItkEi-0001Z7-Eg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:30:57 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItkEi-0001Z0-6r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:30:56 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1ItkEh-0007ms-M3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:30:56 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] USB Asynchronous I/O
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:30:48 +0000
References: <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160F090828@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
In-Reply-To: <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160F090828@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200711181330.49832.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Arnon Gilboa <arnon.gilboa@qumranet.com>

> there might be
> some issues in the ohci/uhci because they currently assume only
> isochronous transfers are async.

That's definitely incorrect. The USB mass storage emulation uses async bulk 
transfers.

Paul