All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@piasta.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:40:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119174034.1b7e9bb7@catlap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47415A73.9020107@interdart.co.uk>

>Hi

Hi

>I have a router with a large number of iptables rules and some
>extensive traffic shaping (HTB + RED + ... ) + conntrack.

Performance boost tips:

- Use "set" module instead of sequential iptables rules. It can lower
cpu usage.

- Use hashing filters for shaping if you're using many u32 filters.

- configure conntrack to use bigger hashsize for better performance;
i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to achieve this:
ip_conntrack.hashsize\x1048575 

- configure routecache to use bigger to use more memory for better
performance; i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to
achieve this: rhash_entries$00000

>1. What processors should I be looking for in order to achieve the
>best routing throughput on a linux router?

I've had good experiences with P4 (with and without HT), Athlon64, Xeon
[dempsey], Xeon [woodcrest]. The last one is the best choice because of
the large cache and architecture. I think you can use Core 2 Duo too
if you want to save some money.

>2. Is it true that multicore processors will not help much in this 
>situation?

Not true. In your setup with two nics with same load you can easily use
two cores. You can assign each nic to different core by the means of
smp_affinity setting in /proc/irq/... or by using irqbalance daemon.

>Best regards,
>Derek

pozdrawiam
Marek Kierdelewicz
KoBa ISP
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-19 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-19  9:42 [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping? Derek Sims
2007-11-19 16:40 ` Marek Kierdelewicz [this message]
2007-11-19 17:55 ` Derek Sims
2007-11-19 23:08 ` sawar
2007-11-20  1:03 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2007-11-20  3:15 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20  3:30 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20 16:03 ` Marco C. Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071119174034.1b7e9bb7@catlap \
    --to=marek@piasta.pl \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.