From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9405] New: iSCSI does not implement ordering guarantees required by e.g. journaling filesystems Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:18:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20071119211854.GG12494@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071119125040.9f6eb1e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4741FCEA.4040101@cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:38482 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867AbXKSVS4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:18:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4741FCEA.4040101@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Christie Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bart.vanassche@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 03:15:22PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote: > +iSCSI It's traditional to use all-caps here, even when the normal capitalisation is different. so I think this should be "ISCSI". Damned if I know why we have this convention, though. > +P: Mike Christie > +M: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu > +L: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com > +W: www.open-iscsi.org > +T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/mnc/linux-2.6-iscsi.git > +S: Maintained -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."