From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:21016 "EHLO s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbXKVPml (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:42:41 -0500 Received: from lin01.mn-solutions.de (pD95F8740.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.95.135.64]) by s131.mittwaldmedien.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5725E4007 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:42:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mnz66.mn-solutions.de (mnz66.mn-logistik.de [192.168.233.66]) by lin01.mn-solutions.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D841E00FD for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:39:45 +0100 (CET) From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mac80211 regression: doesn't associate automatically Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:43:08 +0100 References: <200711220912.10452.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <200711221605.55506.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1195744414.4149.14.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1195744414.4149.14.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200711221643.08290.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20071122_154243_462130_9C146902) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Bottom line is, I don't care. So much I figured out by myself. Maybe you can show me a non-mac80211 driver that behaves in the same way as mac80211? In other words, a driver where you can do ifconfig eth1 up iwconfig eth1 essid SOMESSID iwconfig eth1 key s:11111 and where, as in mac80211, you don't get an association (assuming that the AP is set up accordingly). If you can show me 5 drivers, than I'm willing to assume that there is no regression. So far I haven't seen one non-mac80211 driver that did not associate with this sequence.