From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071123122254.GC2055@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711222121500.25057@localhost.localdomain>
Hi!
> > > but perhaps somehow we miss this fact and fail to turn off the lapic
> > > clockevents drivers?
> >
> > Ok, I guess I'm lost. If I offline second CPU, I immediately get
> > 1000Hz timer tick... is that expected?
>
> Hmm. No. I have no idea why this is happening.
>
> 34196 total events, 55.083 events/sec
> echo 0 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> 36073 total events, 54.679 events/sec
Strange.
> > I'm trying to decide when system is idle (lets say that means "no user
> > task is scheduled to wakeup within 10 seconds)... I added some
> > instrumentation to nohz subsystem, but it does not behave like I'd
> > expect: even if I run "while true; do sleep .01; done" loop, I see
> > nohz preparing for 5 seconds sleep... while it seems obvious that it
> > can only be 10msec sleep, and with max_cstate=1, it works that
> > way... Plus, nte->start_pid seems to contain some random numbers :-(.
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > (Patch for illustration, I can generate full diff against vanilla,
> > but...)
>
> Just to make sure what we are hunting: Do you have the same problem
> with an non-pavel-tainted 2.6.24-rc3 ?
The strange sleep latencies were definitely there, I'll check for
"offline cpu and get 1000 interrupts", too.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 20:31 nohz and strange sleep latencies Pavel Machek
2007-11-19 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 10:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-20 22:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-22 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-22 18:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-22 18:52 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-22 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-23 12:22 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-11-24 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-24 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-24 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-24 23:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-25 20:25 ` [patch] " Pavel Machek
2007-11-25 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-26 11:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071123122254.GC2055@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.