From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: If /dev/snd/controlCx EACCES vs. ENODEV mixup Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:53:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20071125215300.GA22640@tango.0pointer.de> References: <20071125210359.GB17108@tango.0pointer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from tango.0pointer.de (tango.0pointer.de [85.214.72.216]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8490124611 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:53:00 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: ALSA Development Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sun, 25.11.07 22:42, Jaroslav Kysela (perex@perex.cz) wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > BTW, what's the status of the BTS? Takashi asked me to post all my > > issues on the ML instead of on the BTS. So why have the BTS at all? > > It's even linked on the alsa-project.org front page under "I found a > > bug!", which is a bit misleading. If this Mantis thing is not liked at > > all, would it be possible to make some replacement available? Maybe > > just use the kernel bugzilla on bugzilla.kernel.org? It's very fast, > > and certainly more fun to work with than with Mantis. > > I prefer BTS but Takashi not. It's matter of personal preference. Mantis > is easy maintainable and we have more projects (or packages) not only > drivers. The kernel bugzilla already is used for stuff like klibc and other userspace support code for the kernel. I am sure noone would oppose to move the complete bug tracking of ALSA to the kernel bz. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4