All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:40:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071125224010.GA5006@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711252339.00557.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >..
> > > > First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open 
> > > > source world [1], so many users already know it.
> > > > 
> > > > But more important, "it pretends to require them to spend" isn't true 
> > > > because there's no pretending - we actually often require bug reporters 
> > > > to spend a lot of time on the bug report (e.g. when asking for 
> > > > bisecting).
> > > 
> > > But not *initially*.
> > > 
> > > We should not confuse *debugging* with *reporting bugs*.  While the former is
> > > actually more difficult and more time consuming than writing the code in which
> > > the bug is present, the latter should be as simple as sending an email.
> > 
> > For hardcore geeks like you and me sending an email might be easier than 
> > using some web interface.
> > 
> > Normal humans tend to be more accustomed to web interfaces, and 
> > following the instructions on some web page is _much_ easier than 
> > reading three text files for knowing what to write in an email.
> 
> Hm, this is a good argument for having such a web interface, but IMO it
> shouldn't be mandatory.  IOW, there should be a way to report a bug using plain
> email, if the reporter prefers that.  We can, however, request that the address
> of our bug tracking system be added to the report's Cc list.

Looking at both other open source projects and the support of commercial 
software a web interface should be enough.

But this is not the problem - the problem is what happens after the 
initial report with the bug report.

> Now, the question is what information this web interface should ask for.
> 
> IMO, first, it should ask for what the bug is against, ie.:
> - kernel version (to be obtained from 'git describe' or from /proc/version or
>   from .config, if the kernel doesn't boot)
> - architecture (x86, ARM, MIPS etc.)
> - subsystem and subsubsystem (that could be selectable from a menu and might
>   depend on the architecture)
> 
> It also should ask if the problem is a regression and what was the last known
> good kernel (I'd prefer that to be the last known major release selectable from
> a list).
> 
> Also, the reporter should be required to provide a summary (subject) and
> a (concise) description of the problem and a list of email addresses to
> send the report to in addition to the regular handling (there should be a way
> to verify which addresses are acceptable).
> 
> Anything else?
> 
> Next, the report should be sent to a mailing list selected on the basis of the
> information provided (not necessarily to individual developers, unless there
> are some addresses provided explicitly by the reporter).

The architecture choice seems to be the only thing from your list that
isn't already available in the "Enter a new bug report" dialog of the
kernel Bugzilla.

> IMO, it should be possible to work on the bug using both email and the web
> interface, whichever is preferred by the participant in question, without the
> need to stick to any of them (ie. email messages sent in the corresponding
> email thread should be registered by the bug tracking system and comments
> entered into it should appear as messages in the email thread with the
> appropriate To:, From: and Cc: information).
> 
> There surely are more things that we'd like it to do, but the above seem to be
> a reasonable minimum.

Except from the From: header in outgoing emails the kernel Bugzilla 
already offers this for years.

>...
> Greetings,
> Rafael

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-25 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-22 19:07 "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup Frans Pop
     [not found] ` <200711241904.13132.bzolnier@gmail.com>
2007-11-24 19:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25  0:26     ` kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-11-25 13:11       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 13:49         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 20:07           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 20:08             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-25 20:32             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 21:28               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 21:36                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 22:38                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 22:40                     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-11-25 23:28                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 23:34                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-26  0:30                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-26 21:45                             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-26 22:57                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 22:55                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 14:08         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-11-25 20:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]   ` <200711242038.06677.elendil@planet.nl>
2007-11-24 20:12     ` "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]     ` <200711250013.51279.bzolnier@gmail.com>
2007-11-26  1:32       ` Frans Pop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071125224010.GA5006@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.