All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:47:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071127164723.GA3406@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071127070912.GB1735@ff.dom.local>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:09:12AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 25-11-2007 18:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> >> Is there any technical reason why we need 4 different schedulers at all?
> > 
> > Until we have the perfect scheduler :-)
> 
> IMHO this is not enough yet. There is something called "the right
> of choice",

That's a common misconception about open source software:

There is nothing like a "right of choice".
There is a "right to change the source code".

This means you cannot demand from anyone to offer any choices, but you 
can fork the code yourself and use and distribute modified code 
containing any choices you consider reasonable.

> and, it seems, things are usually far from perfect
> where this right is not respected.

That's wrong.

It's actually often much worse to have different choices with different 
features and bugfixes than having one version that contains all features 
and all bugfixes.

> Regards,
> Jarek P.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-27 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-25 16:18 [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 16:21 ` Jens Axboe
2007-11-25 16:31   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 16:45     ` Jens Axboe
2007-11-25 16:56       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 17:22         ` Jens Axboe
2007-11-26  4:57           ` Al Boldi
2007-11-26  5:12             ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-26  5:28               ` Al Boldi
2007-11-27  7:09           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-27 16:47             ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-11-27 22:15               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-27 22:53                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-28  0:20                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-27 23:02                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-27 23:21                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-30 17:52                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-25 23:27         ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071127164723.GA3406@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.