From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [XenLinux]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:01:53 +0000
Message-ID: <20071127170153.GF4197@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20071127164120.GA18219@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<200711271749.05983.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200711271749.05983.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Christoph Egger, le Tue 27 Nov 2007 17:49:05 +0100, a =E9crit :
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 17:41:20 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Alpha and x86_64 architectures don't use socketcall.
> > Fixes bug 1046.
>=20
> Huh? I didn't know someone ported Xen to Alpha.

Oops, I thought __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL was defined by Xen, but it is
actually provided from upstream, where it should probably be fixed too.

Samuel