From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Core2Duo locked at 800MHz Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20071127190518.GC30057@redhat.com> References: <474A6C62.3070103@reinelt.co.at> <20071126190929.GE15764@redhat.com> <474BB4F2.9040604@reinelt.co.at> <1196160448.23251.21.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1196160448.23251.21.camel@queen.suse.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Thomas Renninger Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > the cpufreq.debug=7 logs would be a good start. > > It is probably limited through _PPC again. > Dave, Len: Can you please add the patch that _PPC changes are printed > with cpufreq.debug, pls. > I posted this a while ago on the cpufreq list: > Subject: [PATCH] Print _PPC changes via cpufreq debug layer > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cpufreq/5642 Looks ok to me. Len, you ok with me merging this? Or would you rather it went through the acpi git tree? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk