All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/T V2] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:13:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711281713.02919.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474D83BF.7000102@lwfinger.net>

On Wednesday 28 November 2007 16:05:35 Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > 
> > So it's a lock dependency between rfkill->mutex and wl->mutex?
> > So, now comes the question that really matters. Who is the caller
> > of rfkill_toggle_radio, in the case where it crashes?
> >
> 
> Here is the full dump. It looks to me as if b43_rfkill_soft_toggle() calls rfkill_handler(), which
> calls rfkill_toggle_radio() and it is calling b43_rfkill_soft_toggle(). I'd call that a loop.

I think it's a different bug. The backtrace seems corrupted.

Can you try this patch? There is some circular locking in rfkill.

Index: wireless-2.6/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-2.6.orig/net/rfkill/rfkill.c	2007-11-20 19:09:35.000000000 +0100
+++ wireless-2.6/net/rfkill/rfkill.c	2007-11-28 17:09:55.000000000 +0100
@@ -60,11 +60,7 @@ static void rfkill_led_trigger(struct rf
 static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rfkill *rfkill,
 				enum rfkill_state state)
 {
-	int retval;
-
-	retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rfkill->mutex);
-	if (retval)
-		return retval;
+	int retval = 0;
 
 	if (state != rfkill->state) {
 		retval = rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data, state);
@@ -74,7 +70,6 @@ static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rf
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
 	return retval;
 }
 
@@ -158,12 +153,13 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_state_store(struct
 	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&rfkill->mutex))
+		return -ERESTARTSYS;
 	error = rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill,
 			state ? RFKILL_STATE_ON : RFKILL_STATE_OFF);
-	if (error)
-		return error;
+	mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
 
-	return count;
+	return error ? error : count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t rfkill_claim_show(struct device *dev,

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-28 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-27 16:03 [RFC/T] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action Larry Finger
2007-11-27 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 16:28   ` Larry Finger
2007-11-27 17:05     ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 18:29       ` Ehud Gavron
2007-11-27 20:02   ` [RFC/T V2] " Larry Finger
2007-11-27 20:20     ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 21:22       ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 14:11         ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 15:05           ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:13             ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-11-28 16:41               ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:46                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 17:08                   ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711281713.02919.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.