From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: anders.henke@1und1.de, jack@ucw.cz
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:55:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071129235813Y.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071129130319.GA2642@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:03:19 +0100
Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Adding relevant people and lists to CC...
>
> Honza
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> -----
>
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> From: Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
>
> On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity,
> > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by the 2.6.19 one by copying
> > driver/scsi/dpt_i2o.c driver/scsi/dpti.h and driver/scsi/dpt/ into a
> > vanilla 2.6.23.1. kernel; using this kernel fixed the issue for me.
> >
> > I haven't yet fine-tested from which kernel release on the dpt_i2o driver
> > behaves like this and spews out zeroed blocks when trying to mount
> > the rootfs. Maybe this is just some timing issue.
>
> I've started the fine-tests and can say so far that dpt_i2o from
> 2.6.22 is still fine. Test is simple:
>
> anders@ista:/usr/src/linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/dpt$ cp -r dpt/ dpt_i2o.c dpti.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1/drivers/scsi/
>
> ... recompile the kernel, reboot: works.
>
> 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 differ in terms of the dpt_i2o driver by two different
> patch sets:
> -one 2 Kb small set of patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.22-rc1
> -one 7 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc3
> -one 162 Kb set of patches from 2.6.23-rc9 to 2.6.23-rc10.
>
> When applying the 2.6.23-rc1-based driver to "my" 2.6.31.1 kernel,
> the "zero blocks"-symptom show up, so it's the "lucky" situation
> that the smallest patch actually seams to be the broken one.
>
> According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
>
> FUJITA Tomonori
>
> [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
>
> Stephen Rothwell
> dpt_i2o depends on virt_to_bus
>
> Fujita, would you please take a look at this?
Sorry about the bug. Can you try this?
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c b/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
index 8258506..1255b26 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
@@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = {
.this_id = 7,
.cmd_per_lun = 1,
.use_clustering = ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
- .use_sg_chaining = ENABLE_SG_CHAINING,
+ .use_sg_chaining = DISABLE_SG_CHAINING,
};
static s32 adpt_scsi_register(adpt_hba* pHba)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-29 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-29 13:03 broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd) Jan Kara
2007-11-29 14:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2007-11-29 16:45 ` Anders Henke
2007-11-29 17:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-30 13:27 ` Anders Henke
2007-11-29 17:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-30 10:34 ` Anders Henke
2007-12-11 14:40 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-11 16:07 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry indirectory) (fwd) Salyzyn, Mark
2007-12-11 16:07 ` Salyzyn, Mark
2007-12-11 21:53 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd) Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-12 13:25 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry indirectory) (fwd) Salyzyn, Mark
2007-12-12 13:25 ` Salyzyn, Mark
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-12 10:58 broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd) Anders Henke
2007-12-12 11:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 11:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 13:07 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-12 13:43 ` Anders Henke
2007-12-12 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 19:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-12 14:17 ` Anders Henke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071129235813Y.tomof@acm.org \
--to=tomof@acm.org \
--cc=anders.henke@1und1.de \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jack@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.