From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id lAUGUYff010138 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:30:34 -0500 Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id lAUGUWCP018134 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:30:32 GMT From: Paul Moore To: Joshua Brindle , tmiller@tresys.com Subject: Re: PATCH: peersid capability support Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:30:27 -0500 Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov References: <200711291927.lATJRixF021978@rawhidevm-targeted.columbia.tresys.com> <200711300929.22874.paul.moore@hp.com> <47502191.7050300@manicmethod.com> In-Reply-To: <47502191.7050300@manicmethod.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200711301130.27524.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Friday 30 November 2007 9:43:29 am Joshua Brindle wrote: > Aside from this issue have you tried the patch against your kernel > patches? We did not test with your kernel, we inspected the policy > manually to ensure the ebitmap was set up correctly. Help? What is this patch backed against? I have a fresh copy of the SVN sources and I get a ton of failures applying just this patch. If I go back and apply Josh's original two patches then try applying Todd's patch I still get failures, although there are less of them. BTW, if you want to try the kernel patches you can always test against a current -mm kernel or grab a kernel from here (the git tree is a smidge more current in regards to the audit messages but nothing that would affect the policy capabilities): * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.