From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: lkml@rtr.ca, abelay@novell.com, lenb@kernel.org, mlord@pobox.com,
rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071130142058.816d1693.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEE2FAE6A@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0800
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
Please dont go off-list like this. I put Mark's original mailing list cc's
back.
>
> I will have to Nack this. The reason max_cstate was initentionally
> removed due to couple of reasons:
It broke userspace without any warning or migration period, afaict.
> 1) All in kernel users of max_cstate should rather be using
> pm_qos/latency interfaces. All such max_cstate usages must already be
> migrated.
That code isn't merged.
> 2) Supporting max_cstate as a dynamic parameter cleanly is no longer
> possible in acpi/processor_idle.c as the C-state policy has moved to
> cpuidle instead. It can be done if it is needed. But, just below patch
> will not really work with cpuidle.
>
> Selecting max_cstate at boot time as a debug option still works without
> this patch.
>
> So, just this patch will not get back the functionality with cpuidle.
> Infact changing it at run time will have no effect. Question however is:
> Is there a real need to revive this parameter so that user can change
> max_cstate at run time?
It is not known whether Mark is actually writing to this thing. Perhaps
read-only permissions would be a suitable fix?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-30 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 21:53 + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree akpm
[not found] ` <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEE2FAE6A@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-11-30 22:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-11-30 22:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-11-30 22:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-12-01 2:52 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 3:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01 3:14 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 3:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01 3:31 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 3:44 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 3:48 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 4:02 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 4:31 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 23:43 ` 20000+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.24. Bug? Mark Lord
2007-12-01 23:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-01 23:55 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 0:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-02 1:10 ` Andres Freund
2007-12-02 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-04 17:29 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-04 17:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-04 19:17 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 14:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-02 14:59 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-02 15:45 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:45 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 15:49 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-02 23:41 ` + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree Mark Lord
2008-01-03 0:06 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03 0:06 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03 0:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-03 0:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-03 1:12 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03 1:12 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-03 4:25 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-03 4:18 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04 2:16 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-01-04 3:16 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04 21:52 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-04 21:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-04 21:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-05 16:27 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-06 21:34 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 7:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-07 14:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-07 15:07 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 14:18 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-07 14:18 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-01-07 15:06 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 19:12 ` Len Brown
2008-01-07 21:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 22:43 ` Len Brown
2007-12-01 10:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-01 16:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-05 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-07 21:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-12-07 21:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071130142058.816d1693.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.