From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sagar Borikar" Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:02:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support Message-Id: <20071130180250.27251.qmail@webmail32.rediffmail.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3868818982093150489==" List-Id: References: <20071128160454.24906.qmail@webmail35.rediffmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071128160454.24906.qmail@webmail35.rediffmail.com> To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org This is a multipart mime message --===============3868818982093150489== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Next_1196445770---0-203.199.83.32-27248" This is a multipart mime message --Next_1196445770---0-203.199.83.32-27248 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =A0=0AHi Jean,=0A=0AWe tested it with 3.0.0 and it worked fine. Thanks=0A= =0A- Sagar=0A=0AOn Thu, 29 Nov 2007 Jean Delvare wrote :=0A>Hi Sagar,=0A>= =0A>On 28 Nov 2007 16:04:54 -0000, Sagar Borikar wrote:=0A> > I am using Wi= nbond W83L786NG chip in my box and I wanted to test=0A> > it using lm-senso= rs. I could find the driver patch for this chipe=0A> > supported in 2.6.23-= rc4 onwards. But couldn't find the corresponding=0A> > code in lm-sensors. = Even lm-sensors-3.0.0 is not having chip=0A> > specific code.Can anyone tel= l me how this monitor can be tested?=0A>=0A>Please read this thread:=0A>htt= p://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-November/022032.html=0A>= =0A>lm-sensors 3.0.0 doesn't need have any chip-specific code, so it's no= =0A>surprise that you didn't find any W83L786NG-specific code there. It's= =0A>per design, now that the sysfs interface is fully standardized. So=0A>p= lease give a try to lm-sensors 3.0.0, it should work. If it doesn't,=0A>ple= ase report.=0A>=0A>--=0A>Jean Delvare=0A=0A=0A --Next_1196445770---0-203.199.83.32-27248 Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

=0A 
=0AHi Jean,
=0A
=0AWe tested it with 3.0.0 and it wo= rked fine. Thanks
=0A
=0A- Sagar
=0A
=0AOn Thu, 29 Nov 2007 Jea= n Delvare wrote :
=0A>Hi Sagar,
=0A>
=0A>On 28 Nov 2007 1= 6:04:54 -0000, Sagar Borikar wrote:
=0A> > I am using Winbond W83L= 786NG chip in my box and I wanted to test
=0A> > it using lm-senso= rs. I could find the driver patch for this chipe
=0A> > supported = in 2.6.23-rc4 onwards. But couldn't find the corresponding
=0A> > = code in lm-sensors. Even lm-sensors-3.0.0 is not having chip
=0A> >= ; specific code.Can anyone tell me how this monitor can be tested?
=0A&g= t;
=0A>Please read this thread:
=0A>http://lists.lm-sensors.org= /pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-November/022032.html
=0A>
=0A>lm-sen= sors 3.0.0 doesn't need have any chip-specific code, so it's no
=0A>s= urprise that you didn't find any W83L786NG-specific code there. It's
=0A= >per design, now that the sysfs interface is fully standardized. So
= =0A>please give a try to lm-sensors 3.0.0, it should work. If it doesn't= ,
=0A>please report.
=0A>
=0A>--
=0A>Jean Delvare=0A=0A

=0A=0A=0A

=0A
3D'Shaadi'
--Next_1196445770---0-203.199.83.32-27248-- --===============3868818982093150489== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors --===============3868818982093150489==--