All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:26:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071130202622.GA15006@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301147100.2242@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>


* Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > This was not any "formal" x86 maintainance activity - your patches are 
> > still cooking. But i was thinking about maybe putting these patches into 
> > the x86 test grind to get them shaken out some more the random 1000 
> > bootup tests a day that it does. When integrating your patches I found a 
> > bug and tentatively reported it to you, pointing out that it could 
> > easily be my merge fault. Basically i was offering you to let your 
> > patches cook in another kitchen as well. I never before had a negative 
> > response to that :-/
> 
> You could have asked me for a patch against the x86 tree instead of 
> forcing these into your tree. [...]

ugh? What i did was something even better: i merged your patches myself 
(with some caveats, which i pointed out). That's something that people 
consider as a "cool, you just saved me some work!" moment, not a "hey, 
dont you dare forcing MY patches into your tree" incident ;-) At least 
that's how 99.9% of the people on lkml typically see it.

You really need to take a vacation ASAP! =B-)

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-30 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-30  6:43 [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64 Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30  6:43 ` [patch 1/3] Percpu infrastructure to rebase the per cpu area to 0UL Christoph Lameter
2007-12-02  3:04   ` Rusty Russell
2007-12-02  3:13   ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-30  6:43 ` [patch 2/3] X86_64: Declare pda as per cpu data thereby moving it into the cpu area Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30  6:43 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Make the x86_32 percpu operations usable on x86_64 Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 20:07   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 11:24 ` [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops " Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 11:26   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 17:08     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 17:19     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 18:00       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 18:24         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 18:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 18:47             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 19:45               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 19:59                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 20:06                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 20:09                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 20:26                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-30 20:43                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 18:41           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-30 18:43             ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071130202622.GA15006@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.