From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.24-rc3] rtc-cmos alarm acts as oneshot
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:44:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071201074400.GA14709@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711301418.24033.david-b@pacbell.net>
* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Start making the rtc-cmos alarm act more like a oneshot alarm by
> disabling that alarm after its IRQ fires. (ACPI hooks are also
> needed.)
>
> The Linux RTC framework has previously been a bit vague in this area,
> but any other behavior is problematic and not very portable. RTCs
> with full YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM[:SS] alarms won't have a problem here.
> Only ones with partial match criteria, with the most visible example
> being the PC RTC, get confused. (Because the criteria will match
> repeatedly.)
>
> Update comments relating to that oneshot behavior and timezone
> handling. (Timezones are another issue that's mostly visible with
> rtc-cmos. That's because PCs often dual-boot MS-Windows, which likes
> its RTC to match local wall-clock time instead of UTC.)
Cool. I'm still wondering about:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7014
basically, we had universally working /dev/rtc before, now it appears we
dont have it anymore. Or were the problems in this bugzilla present with
the old code too?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 22:18 [patch 2.6.24-rc3] rtc-cmos alarm acts as oneshot David Brownell
2007-12-01 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-01 8:20 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071201074400.GA14709@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.