Re: git-merge --no-commit commits

[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 6:10 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I am using git 1.5.3.4 and just did the following (v1 and v2 are
>>> branches; v1 is a parent of v2):
>>>
>>> git checkout v1
>>> git merge --no-commit v2
>>>
>>> It simply fast-forwarded AND committed even though I explicitly told
>>> it not to. What gives?
>>
>> The --no-commit option doesn't prevent fast-forward because
>> fast-forward doesn't really _create_ a commit (and -no-commit is
>> really about commit creation). It just advanced ref (branch head).
>>
>> You probably wanted to use
>>
>>   $ git merge --no-commit --no-ff v2
> 
> Yes. Thanks. Isn't that counter-intuitive, though? The manpage says
> that it lets you review the changes first. I assumed this would
> include fast-forwarding as well. 

But for fast-forward there are no "changes" to review. Just updating
branch head. Fast-forward means no new commit.

> There is no --no-ff in my git-merge 
> manpage. Maybe I need a newer version?

It looks like it is not in any released version. I've found description
in 'master' version of Documentation/merge-options.txt
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland