All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>,
	yakui.zhao@intel.com, Chris Holvenstot <cholvenstot@comcast.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com,
	trenn@suse.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: pnpacpi : exceeded the max number of IO resources
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:15:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204011540.GA2713@darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1196729713.13969.1.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:55:13AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 18:02 +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 30-11-07 23:22, Rene Herman wrote:
> > 
> > > On 30-11-07 14:14, Chris Holvenstot wrote:
> > > 
> > >> For what it is worth I too have seen this problem this morning and it
> > >> DOES appear to be new (in contrast to a previous comment)
> > >>
> > >> The message:  pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources: 12
> > >>
> > >> is displayed each time the system is booted with the 2.6.24-rc3-git5
> > >> kernel but is NOT displayed when booting 2.6.24-rc3-git4
> > >>
> > >> I have made no changes in my config file between these two kernels other
> > >> than to accept any new defaults when running make oldconfig.
> > >>
> > >> If you had already narrowed it down to a change between git4 and git5 I
> > >> apologize for wasting your time.  Have to run to work now.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, and re-added the proper CCs. Sigh...
> > > 
> > > Well, yes, the warning is actually new as well. Previously your kernel 
> > > just silently ignored 8 more mem resources than it does now it seems.
> > > 
> > > Given that people are hitting these limits, it might make sense to just 
> > > do away with the warning for 2.6.24 again while waiting for the dynamic 
> > > code?
> > 
> > Ping. Should these warnings be reverted for 2.6.24?
> Revert the warning doesn't make any sense. I'd suggest changing the IO
> resources number bigger till Thomas's patch in.
Agree.
Change it to 90 works for me, But I think maybe 128 is better.

include/linux/pnp.h |    2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -upr linux/include/linux/pnp.h linux.new/include/linux/pnp.h
--- linux/include/linux/pnp.h	2007-12-04 09:09:23.000000000 +0800
+++ linux.new/include/linux/pnp.h	2007-12-04 09:09:40.000000000 +0800
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 
-#define PNP_MAX_PORT		24
+#define PNP_MAX_PORT		128
 #define PNP_MAX_MEM		12
 #define PNP_MAX_IRQ		2
 #define PNP_MAX_DMA		2

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-04  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-30 13:14 pnpacpi : exceeded the max number of IO resources Chris Holvenstot
2007-11-30 22:22 ` Rene Herman
2007-12-03 17:02   ` Rene Herman
2007-12-03 22:51     ` Chris Holvenstot
2007-12-04  0:55     ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-04  1:15       ` Dave Young [this message]
2007-12-05 20:39         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-19  3:07           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-09  3:50     ` Len Brown
2008-01-09  9:34       ` Frans Pop
2008-01-09 14:47         ` Rene Herman
2008-01-16  5:55           ` Dave Young
2008-01-16  8:00             ` Rene Herman
2008-01-16 13:04               ` Rene Herman
2008-01-19 11:03             ` Frans Pop
2008-01-19 18:38               ` Bjorn Helgaas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-29  9:11 Dave Young
2007-11-30  1:18 ` Dave Young
2007-11-30  2:21   ` Zhao Yakui
2007-11-30  6:40     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-30  8:14       ` Zhao Yakui
2007-11-30  2:18 ` Rene Herman
2007-11-30  2:32   ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071204011540.GA2713@darkstar.lan \
    --to=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=cholvenstot@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.