From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzyhO-0005Hu-C0 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:10:18 -0800 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IzyhM-0000Qw-SN for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:10:18 -0800 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:09:59 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20071205180959.GA7934@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20071205163024.GA7241@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071205164816.GB25641@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: attachment In-Reply-To: <20071205164816.GB25641@elte.hu> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - change sigcontext fields to match x86 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , uml-devel , "H. Peter Anvin" On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:48:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > thanks, we indeed missed those. Should we carry this in x86.git, or > would you like to carry this in your UML tree? Probably better for it to go in x86.git - that way it travels with your sigcontext patch. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753899AbXLESKh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:10:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751684AbXLESK3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:10:29 -0500 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:54651 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751615AbXLESK2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:10:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:09:59 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , uml-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - change sigcontext fields to match x86 Message-ID: <20071205180959.GA7934@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20071205163024.GA7241@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071205164816.GB25641@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment In-Reply-To: <20071205164816.GB25641@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:48:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > thanks, we indeed missed those. Should we carry this in x86.git, or > would you like to carry this in your UML tree? Probably better for it to go in x86.git - that way it travels with your sigcontext patch. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com