From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] A clean approach to writeout throttling
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:13:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712062313.43383.phillips@phunq.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071206162915.a3917d1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thursday 06 December 2007 16:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:04:41 -0800
>
> Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net> wrote:
> > The runner up key idea is that we will gain a notion of "block
> > device stack" (or block stack for short, so that we may implement
> > block stackers) which for the time being will simply be Device
> > Mapper's notion of device stack, however many warts that may have.
> > It's there now and we use it for ddsnap.
>
> Perhaps all we need to track is the outermost point?
>
> submit_bio(...)
> {
> bool remove_the_rq = false;
>
> ...
> if (current->the_rq == NULL) {
> current->the_rq = rq;
> remove_the_rq = true;
> }
> ...
> if (remove_the_rq)
> current->the_rq = NULL;
> }
>
> ?
The parent patch already has that crucial property in a simple say, see
if (q && q->metric && !bio->bi_queue) {
bio->bi_queue = q;
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-07 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-06 0:03 [RFC] [PATCH] A clean approach to writeout throttling Daniel Phillips
2007-12-06 1:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 6:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-06 7:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 9:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-06 11:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 15:52 ` Rik van Riel
2007-12-06 17:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 17:48 ` Rik van Riel
2007-12-06 20:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-06 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 21:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-06 21:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-07 0:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-07 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 7:13 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2007-12-10 9:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 10:47 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 11:23 ` [RFC] [PATCH] A clean aEvgeniy pproach " Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 12:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 12:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 12:32 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 13:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 13:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 13:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 13:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 13:53 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 14:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-11 13:15 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-11 19:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-11 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-11 20:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-11 20:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 11:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH] A clean approach " Daniel Phillips
2007-12-10 21:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
2007-12-10 22:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-12-11 4:21 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712062313.43383.phillips@phunq.net \
--to=phillips@phunq.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.