From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: delay via-rhine irq initialisation.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:39:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com> (raw)
With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ set, via-rhine complains during init.
(See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377721 for a report).
Does this diff look right?
(I don't have a via-rhine handy to test with)
We may be able to get away with moving the request_irq to just after the
alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
stand more chance of doing the right thing.
Comments?
Dave
Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
index 07263cd..37b3efb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
+++ b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
@@ -1151,24 +1151,28 @@ static int rhine_open(struct net_device *dev)
void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
int rc;
- rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
- dev);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
if (debug > 1)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: rhine_open() irq %d.\n",
dev->name, rp->pdev->irq);
rc = alloc_ring(dev);
- if (rc) {
- free_irq(rp->pdev->irq, dev);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }
+
alloc_rbufs(dev);
alloc_tbufs(dev);
rhine_chip_reset(dev);
init_registers(dev);
+
+ rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
+ dev);
+ if (rc) {
+ free_rbufs(dev);
+ free_tbufs(dev);
+ free_ring(dev);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
if (debug > 2)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Done rhine_open(), status %4.4x "
"MII status: %4.4x.\n",
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 23:39 Dave Jones [this message]
2007-12-23 3:36 ` delay via-rhine irq initialisation Jeff Garzik
2008-01-02 23:34 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.