All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:38:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213133829.6d850a1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0712131055570.4414-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:02:36 -0500 (EST)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:37:40 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch (as994) reorganizes the way suspend and resume
> > > notifications are sent to drivers.  The major changes are that now the
> > > PM core acquires every device semaphore before calling the methods,
> > > and calls to device_add() during suspends will fail.
> > 
> > Causes my t61p to deadlock during suspend-to-RAM.  Really late - the little
> > moon symbol has started to flash but the LCD is still powered and the
> > cursor still blinks.  Only a poweroff restores control.
> 
> Is there any chance of debugging this?

Spose so, although debugging 2.6.24-rc5 regressions seems a more useful way
to spend one's time.

>  You have removed the patch from 
> the current -mm source.  Does anybody else report a similar problem?
> 
> Proper debugging would require, to begin with, enabling 
> CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE and booting with no_console_suspend.

Will try to remember to take a look this evening.

Speaking of efficient use of resources: how many other people have tested
suspend-to-disk with this patch applied?  And on how many machines?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-13 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-21 19:37 [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending Alan Stern
2007-09-21 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-10 20:42 ` patch pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2007-12-13  7:42 ` [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 16:02   ` Alan Stern
2007-12-13 21:38     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-14 15:32       ` Alan Stern
2007-12-13 16:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  0:08     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  0:22       ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  1:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  7:20     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  7:31     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 16:49       ` Alan Stern
2007-12-15  0:17         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-17 22:50 Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071213133829.6d850a1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.