From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:42:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20071213204219.GF25130@elte.hu> References: <20071213170348.GA25981@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gautham R Shenoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Paul E McKenney , Dipankar Sarma , Ted Tso , dvhltc@us.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , bunk@kernel.org, Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > > > > Currently it is based against the latest linux-2.6-sched-devel.git > > > > Awaiting your feedback! > > Hi Gautham, > > Thanks for posting this. I believe this is the same version of preempt > RCU as we have in the RT patch. It seems to be very stable. I ran the > RT patch version of the RCU Preempt (just the Preempt RCU patches > without RT on latest git) on a 64way box and the results seems just as > good (if not slightly better) than classic RCU! I'll rerun this patch > series on that box and post the results. > > >From what I'm seening with this, is that it is ready for mainline. > >These > patches should probably go into -mm and be ready for 2.6.25. If Andrew > wants to wait for my results, I'll run them tonight. > > Thanks Gautham, Paul and Dipankar for all this great work! Steve, if you went with a fine comb over the code and have done a thorough review, could you send me your Reviewed-by line for this patchset? Ingo