From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16897DE066 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:31:18 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] CPM1: implement GPIO API Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:31:11 +0100 References: <47600F5E.8060907@scram.de> <20071213165530.GB4347@loki.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <20071213165530.GB4347@loki.buserror.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200712132131.11835.arnd@arndb.de> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 13 December 2007, Scott Wood wrote: > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_request); > > This is an API, not internals; can we stick with plain EXPORT_SYMBOL()? The architecture independent API posted by David Brownell uses _GPL, see http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/9/141. I'd vote for _GPL on all new interfaces anyway, but I guess this one is really David's decision since he came up with the API. Arnd <><