From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1J4A7v-00076j-IG for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:10:59 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4A7u-00076X-5V for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:10:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4A7t-00076J-Ad for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:10:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4A7t-00076G-5u for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:10:57 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4A7s-0001rc-JK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:10:57 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3990E3EB23 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:14:28 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:10:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20071206120123.GC13758@thorin> <4764FD77.2090609@nic.fi> <20071216110235.GA7069@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20071216110235.GA7069@thorin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712170810.53995.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:10:58 -0000 On Sunday 16 December 2007 12:02, Robert Millan wrote: > Another question is, how will we do context reply for patches? The BTS > doesn't seem to easily allow this. Maybe we could followup on our replies > via bug-grub ? But a problem with that is that it'll be hard to see the > full context of a discussion when browsing bugs. This was exactly what I didn't like with (most) bug trackers... Does the Patch Tracker provide any useful feature to this? When I looked at this, it was no different from the Bug Tracker, so I simply disabled it. But this was some years ago. > Another problem is that submitter is likely not subscribed to bug-grub > (does the message you get when trying to write there without being > subscribed say you have to subscribe, or that you have to wait for someone > to process your mail (which won't happen) ?). It might be possible to configure the mailman to push through email from savannah. Okuji