From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
prasanna@in.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, systemtap-ml <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:58:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071218135856.GC17470@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1197978160.7734.31.camel@brick>
* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 12:29 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I missed an ifdef in this patch in the following hunk:
> >
> > could you resend your kprobes cleanups against current x86.git? They
> > have been conceptually acked by Masami. This cuts out the unification
> > part of your queue which is bad luck but the effort has been duplicated
> > already so there's not much we can do about it i guess.
> >
> > Your other 17 cleanup and unification patches are still queued up in
> > x86.git and passed a lot of testing, so they will likely go into
> > v2.6.25. Nice work!
> >
> > Ingo
>
> Ingo,
>
> I'd suggest just tossing my kprobes cleanups. I just sent you a rollup
> of anything I saw that was left in mine that was still worthwhile
> after Masami's, included below for reference. It didn't amount to much
> left so I rolled it all together:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: kprobes leftover cleanups
>
> Eliminate __always_inline, all of these static functions are
> only called once. Minor whitespace cleanup. Eliminate one
> supefluous return at end of void function. Reverse sense of
> #ifndef to be #ifdef to show the case only affects X86_32.
thanks, i've applied them.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-18 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-17 22:27 [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64 Harvey Harrison
2007-12-18 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 11:42 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-18 13:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2007-12-19 2:30 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-19 4:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2007-12-19 5:21 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-19 5:27 ` [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations Harvey Harrison
2007-12-19 5:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2007-12-19 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 13:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-17 21:27 [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64 Harvey Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071218135856.GC17470@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.