Re: [PATCH] usb/storage/initializers.c: fix signedness difference

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:23:42 +0100
Marcin __lusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> wrote:

> usb/storage/initializers.c: fix signedness difference
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcin __lusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c b/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c
> index ee5b42a..187dd1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ int usb_stor_ucr61s2b_init(struct us_data *us)
>  {
>  	struct bulk_cb_wrap *bcb = (struct bulk_cb_wrap*) us->iobuf;
>  	struct bulk_cs_wrap *bcs = (struct bulk_cs_wrap*) us->iobuf;
> -	int res, partial;
> +	int res;
> +	unsigned int partial;
>  	static char init_string[] = "\xec\x0a\x06\x00$PCCHIPS";
> 
>  	US_DEBUGP("Sending UCR-61S2B initialization packet...\n");

Often we just wouldn't bother about something this minor.

But I see later on that we pass the address of `partial' into some other
function and I am guessing that this produces some warning with some tool
which you didn't tell us about?