From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.suse.de", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7DDDDFF for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:15:39 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:14:25 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: patch pci-fix-bus-resource-assignment-on-32-bits-with-64b-resources.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree Message-ID: <20071221001425.GB23322@suse.de> References: <11981938363358@kroah.org> <1198194973.6779.35.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1198194973.6779.35.camel@pasglop> Cc: greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:56:13AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > The current pci_assign_unassigned_resources() code doesn't work properly > > on 32 bits platforms with 64 bits resources. The main reason is the use > > of unsigned long in various places instead of resource_size_t. > > > > This fixes it, along with some tricks to avoid casting to 64 bits on > > platforms that don't need it in every printk around. > > Can you still edit the changelog ? Yes I can. > If yes, please remove that sentence > since the latest version (which you put in your tree) doesn't actually > have those tricks anymore as per discussion on the list... Ok, now done, thanks. greg k-h