All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses...
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:44:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221004416.GA15922@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071220164000.58c43b42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > +		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> >  		__raw_spin_lock(&die.lock);
> > -		raw_local_save_flags(flags);
> >  		die.lock_owner = smp_processor_id();
> >  		die.lock_owner_depth = 0;
> >  		bust_spinlocks(1);
> > -	}
> > -	else
> > -		raw_local_save_flags(flags);
> > +	} else
> > +		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> >  
> >  	if (++die.lock_owner_depth < 3) {
> >  		unsigned long esp;
> 
> Looks sane.
> 
> I suppose there's some reason why we can't just use 
> spin_lock_irqsave(). But that reason was either so obvious or so 
> unimportant that a comment was not needed.  Sigh.

bug was introduced via:

  commit 39743c9ef717fd4f2b5583f010115c5f2482b8ae
  Author: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
  Date:   Fri Oct 19 20:35:03 2007 +0200

      x86: use raw locks during oopses

-               spin_lock_irqsave(&die.lock, flags);
+               __raw_spin_lock(&die.lock);
+               raw_local_save_flags(flags);

that is not a correct open-coding of spin_lock_irqsave(): both the 
ordering is wrong (irqs should be disabled _first_), and the wrong 
flags-saving API was used.

so this is a post-2.6.23 regression and the fix is (now) obvious.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-21  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-20 22:40 Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses Trond Myklebust
2007-12-20 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-20 22:56   ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-20 23:06     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-21  0:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-21 10:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-20 23:04   ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-20 23:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21  0:02     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21  0:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21  0:30       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21  0:40         ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21  0:44           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-21 10:27           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 10:42             ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 11:12               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 11:34                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 12:31                   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071221004416.GA15922@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.