From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1J772y-0002pW-Cp for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:30:04 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J772v-0002n9-Pi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:30:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J772u-0002ld-ND for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:30:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J772u-0002lT-AP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:30:00 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J772u-0008JL-8h for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:30:00 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B153EB23; Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:34:06 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:29:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20071222194111.GA8254@durotan.0x539.de> <20071225093241.GA12060@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20071225093241.GA12060@thorin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712251129.58555.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: 457491-forwarded@bugs.debian.org, Philipp Kern , Robert Millan Subject: Re: Fwd: grub2: FTBFS on powerpc (__floatundisf in ls is not defined) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:30:02 -0000 On Tuesday 25 December 2007 10:32, Robert Millan wrote: > Any comments on this one? > > It seems to me that the module dependency hack doesn't take into account > gcc internal symbols. > > Maybe skipping symbols starting with _ (or __?) would suffice ? If this is easy, I think it would be better to add symbols defined in libgcc into kernel-defined symbols on ppc (as well as on sparc?). Okuji