From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s)
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:14:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712290314.23567.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071228221324.GA9105@does.not.exist>
On Friday 28 December 2007 23:13:24 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:23:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Noteworthy remarks on the unification:
> >...
> > - -funit-at-a-time should be easy to unify but it looks like we have a bug
> > in 32 bit. We only enable -funit-at-a-time for gcc less than 0400 if they
> > support it
>
> No, we _dis_able it on 32bit if a gcc < 4.0 supports it.
>
> > (and I recall it is a gcc 4.00 feature). [-lt -> -gt]
> >...
>
> unit-at-a-time was introduced in upstream gcc 3.4 and backported to some
> popular 3.3 x86_64 branch.
>
> i386 and x86_64 go in exactly opposite directions regarding when to use
> unit-at-a-time, but that was intentional and we should keep it that way.
i386 disabled it because there were claims that it increased stack size
too much, but I haven't seen any real evidence for that. That is why I never
added it to x86-64. On the other hand it tends to shrink text size considerably.
I think it should be reevaluated and enabled by default on i386 again.
BTW there is a patch pending for gcc 4.3+ that prevents optimizations
that increase stack size unduly. Not sure it has been added there yet,
but that was the right fix for these problems anyways.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-29 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 21:23 [PATCH] x86: unify x86 Makefile(s) Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-28 22:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-29 2:14 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-12-29 8:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-29 9:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 9:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-29 12:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29 12:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-29 18:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29 18:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 21:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29 21:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-30 2:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-30 11:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-29 2:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29 8:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712290314.23567.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.