From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] x86 makefile unification and cleaning
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:38:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071229203836.GA21020@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
Since first posting I have updated the patch like this:
o Fixed a few bugs shown up by more extensive testing
o Avoided one ifdef group
o Added a few more comments
o Removed and/or updated a few comments
On top of that I did a few more patches:
Sam Ravnborg (5):
x86: unification of arch/x86/Makefiles
x86: share more options between 32 and 64 bit build
x86: biarch support for 32 bit builds beautified
x86: teach vdso to clean
x86: teach vdso to clean
The resulting diffstat:
arch/x86/Makefile | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/Makefile_32 | 181 -----------------------------------
arch/x86/Makefile_64 | 141 ----------------------------
arch/x86/boot/Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/vdso/Makefile | 2 +
5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 329 deletions(-)
I'm pretty satisfied with the result.
But I hope someone can look into the cpu specific stuff
and merge the remaining bits from 64 bit to the currently 32 bit
only Makefile_32.cpu file.
This will benefit readability and UML I think.
The patches are made on top of the mm branch of the x86 tree.
Patches follows.
Sam
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-29 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-29 20:38 Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: unification of arch/x86/Makefiles Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: share more options between 32 and 64 bit build Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: biarch support for 32 bit builds beautified Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: teach vdso to clean Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] " Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86 makefile unification and cleaning Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-30 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071229203836.GA21020@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.