From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:30:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712301430.08274.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071229234326.GA17807@ucw.cz>
On Sunday, 30 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >
> > Document the fact that __save_processor_state() has to save all CPU
> > registers referred to by the kernel in case a different kernel is
> > used to load and restore a hibernation image containing it.
>
>
> > Sigend-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,21 @@ extern const void __nosave_begin, __nosa
> >
> > struct saved_context saved_context;
> >
> > +/**
> > + * __save_processor_state - save CPU registers before creating a
> > + * hibernation image and before restoring the memory state from it
> > + * @ctxt - structure to store the registers contents in
> > + *
> > + * NOTE: If there is a CPU register the modification of which by the
> > + * boot kernel (ie. the kernel used for loading the hibernation image)
> > + * might affect the operations of the restored target kernel (ie. the one
> > + * saved in the hibernation image), then its contents must be saved by this
> > + * function. In other words, if kernel A is hibernated and different
> > + * kernel B is used for loading the hibernation image into memory, the
> > + * kernel A's __save_processor_state() function must save all registers
> > + * needed by kernel A, so that it can operate correctly after the resume
> > + * regardless of what kernel B does in the meantime.
> > + */
>
> Maybe this warning should be appended to struct saved_context
> definition? Reordering its fields (etc) would be bad news, too,
Hmm, I think they can be reordered without any problem. It's always the same
kernel using them, although at different times.
> and documentation near data structures is easier to find...
Well, I'll add a coment next to the definition of struct saved_context to
explain what it's for, but IMO the behavior of __save_processor_state() is what
_really_ matters (ie. it doesn't matter how and where exactly it saves the
registers as long as __restore_processor_state() can restore their "old"
values).
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-30 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 12:53 [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64 Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-28 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-29 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-30 13:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 13:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-12-30 20:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-30 20:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-29 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-30 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-31 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-31 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-31 17:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-31 17:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-31 9:29 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-12-31 9:29 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-12-30 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-30 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712301430.08274.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.