From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and rt group scheduling
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:27:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071231092738.GA30380@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071231001137.147986000@chello.nl>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> I spend xmas implementing group scheduling for the realtime scheduling
> classes. Its a tad raw, but seems to work for the trivial test cases I
> threw at it.
>
> The hrtick stuff is unrelated but was still stuck in my sched queue.
thanks Peter, this is really cool stuff! I have picked up all 3 patches
into sched-devel.git - let's see how they work out.
(btw., i had to do the fixes below. Are you sure you sent the right
version of the patches?)
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sch
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
- struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
@@ -527,10 +526,8 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
do {
rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rq, rt_rq);
- if (unlikely(!rt_se)) {
- foo = 1;
+ if (unlikely(!rt_se))
goto retry;
- }
rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
} while (rt_rq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-31 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-31 0:11 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and rt group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/3] sched: high-res preemption tick Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/3] sched: rt time limit Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/3] sched: rt group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-31 13:51 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and " Balbir Singh
2007-12-31 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071231092738.GA30380@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.